WATCH: Anderson Cooper rushes to a commercial when Trump’s accuser said something really STUPID

The woman who is accusing Trump of rape just said something really stupid which led Anderson Cooper to rush to a commercial:



I can imagine Cooper’s producers yelling in his ear to go to a break after she said “I think most people think of rape as being sexy”. Who thinks that rape is sexy? What in the world is she talking about?

And did you see the creepy way she said “you’re fascinating to talk to” after he said he was gong to a break? Something about this woman just doesn’t sit well with me.

All of this just after her saying a couple days ago that she didn’t want to bring charges against Trump because it would take away from women getting raped at the border or something. When will CNN learn not to have on these crazies? Oh, as long as they bash Trump, prolly never.

Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.

253 thoughts on “WATCH: Anderson Cooper rushes to a commercial when Trump’s accuser said something really STUPID

  1. Wow. Just…..wow.

    How can someone this stupid be in any type of affluent position? I think we need to start removing the warning labels off of products, we’re preventing Darwin’s theory of natural selection from doing it’s job.

  2. Goal accomplished she has assured that her New York Times Obituary will lead in with this accusation. Another aged has been looking for fame, relevance in NY society circles again and a push for her book ( coming soon to Goodwill $1 bin near you ) As far as Anderson goes just another CNN puppet

  3. I think she actually revealed her own motive for doing this; for going public with this story. This never actually happened. She only WISHES it did or could. She fantasizes about being raped by some powerful man. She even comes onto Anderson Cooper whose own homosexuality he makes no effort to keep secret. I wonder if she thinks she can get him to switch sides.

    1. She’s trying to sell books, and revive a failing career. She should lay off the booze and pills, though. Not a flattering mix.

  4. This lady seems like she has more than a few screws loose……. not to mention it seems like she’s been hitting the sauce or the pills. She is less credible than Ballsey-Ford, who had no credibility whatsoever in spite of all the attention she got from libs.

  5. She is from the feminist author Erica Jong “Fear of Flying” generation – the zipless f*ck fantasy ladies. Look it up.

    Women actually did what Trump described – he was no predator. He was a victim of the first round of “liberated ladies”. You had to have been there.

    Erica Jong and Jane Fonda wailed the streets would run with blood if Obama was not elected in 2008. And got national publicity for their very utterances – the start of our long national nightmare. Look that one up too.

    Moving past that is what Trump meant when he asked for America to be Great Again. No we, don’t want to go back to the days of first wave feminism.

    1. When Confederate Democrats call Lincoln Republicans racists, consider the source..

      When radical intolerant extremist Democrat liberal fascists calls Constitutional Lincoln Republicans fascists, consider the source..

      When Democrat militant feminists and sexual predator serial rapists accuse Republicans of rape, consider the source ..

      The pattern is always the same with Democrats, just accuse Republicans of what they were and are guilty of, (projectionism) then Wala.. they’re righteous, noble, and good.. and Lincoln Republicans are evil .. lol yeah, right .. lol

  6. I think she gave Anderson Cooper the creeps. He probably had that chair she sat in tossed out and his desk sanitized after that segment.

  7. Well, that programmed political propaganda scene just imploded to hell .. again.. lol

    Yeah, another perfect leftwing false rape accuser political tool to use against Republicans .. lol

    1. But it’s so EARLY yet! It’s not even 2020….this is going to be a LOOOOONNNGGG year and a half. :whew:

  8. She’s creepy and bat crap crazy. Those remarks are very telling considering she is accusing someone of rape.

    1. Yep. Another New Age mystic shamaness who was astrally penetrated by Trump in her mushroom driven fever dream.

      Rub some essential oils on it, honey, it’ll make it feel better.

  9. Her and Bernie Sanders would get along great, he said the same thing. And they’re both insane for saying it.

  10. Whoa! What a strange woman, and I’m trying to think what/who she reminds me of. Something there. Maybe it’ll come to me.

      1. You know, yeah, maybe that’s it. Maybe, though, Jim Carrey in The Mask or him as Fire Marshall Bill.

  11. She’s an embarrassment to herself. Why would anyone put her on TV?………Oh, that’s right she’s accusing Trump. 😉

    1. I’ll say it: CNN is a very deep state CIA sponsored disinformation operation.
      No other explanation works.

    1. Who else are they going to get to bash Trump – just some fat old union bosses. She was the best they could find for this 24 hour news cycle.

  12. With such a…er…flexible definition of ‘rape’ and a curious perception of prevailing attitudes about rape, no doubt she’ll be accusing the very gay AC of ‘raping’ her.

    1. Where commie-socialist progressives are involved, words do not mean anything anymore. Lies are truth and truth are lies and we are all screwed.

  13. “Who thinks that rape is sexy?”

    Well obviously, she does. Only a person who thinks that rape is ‘sexy’ would go public with their bizarre sexual fantasies about being raped by Trump in a department store, and about illegals raping each other ‘on the border’. The woman is deranged.

  14. There are some people who think of rape as sexy, but they are an extreme minority, and they are usually the kind of women who lack confidence and want men to take care of everything for them. She has revealed herself as one of those pathetic women.

  15. I did not scroll all the way down, so do not know if anyone else found this but I received this today:
    Comment on Twitter, Dear @ CNN: I saw your interview of E. Jean Carroll. Her story sounds a lot like an episode of Special Victims Unit—Episode 11, Season 13, Discussion of a rape fantasy in the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman’s. Story by : Marygrace O’Shea & Julie Martin & Warren Leight; Teleplay by : Marygrace O’Shea.

    https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2019/06/25/ok-this-is-officially-weird-check-out-this-law-order-clip-after-watching-e-jean-carrolls-cnn-interview/?utm_source=twtydaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=67179056832c7a142c7fbd2ddcf54548

  16. I did not scroll all the way down, so do not know if anyone else found this but I received this today:
    Comment on Twitter, Dear @ CNN: I saw your interview of E. Jean Carroll. Her story sounds a lot like an episode of Special Victims Unit—Episode 11, Season 13, Discussion of a rape fantasy in the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman’s. Story by : Marygrace O’Shea & Julie Martin & Warren Leight; Teleplay by : Marygrace O’Shea.

    https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2019/06/25/ok-this-is-officially-weird-check-out-this-law-order-clip-after-watching-e-jean-carrolls-cnn-interview/?utm_source=twtydaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=67179056832c7a142c7fbd2ddcf54548

  17. There are some people who think of rape as sexy, but they are an extreme minority, and they are usually the kind of women who lack confidence and want men to take care of everything for them. She has revealed herself as one of those pathetic women.

          1. Yeah, but it might be just slightly more than 50. Like 57 genders or Oboomba’s 57 States.

  18. As a survivor, I can tell you…THERE IS NOTHING SEXY ABOUT RAPE. She is one sick woman. She is out for fame at the expense of real VICTIMS of sexual assault, just like that other woman, you know the one who accused Kavanaugh.

    1. You mean the lady with “beach friends”?

      Sorry, joyful, that you ever had to go through something like that. Hope the man was thrown under the prison, for life, or worse.

  19. Goal accomplished she has assured that her New York Times Obituary will lead in with this accusation. Another aged has been looking for fame, relevance in NY society circles again and a push for her book ( coming soon to Goodwill $1 bin near you ) As far as Anderson goes just another CNN puppet

      1. Hi there @pybop been a long time, been passing each other by apparently. FWIW I find pretty great buys in our Goodwill book bin 🙂

  20. Wow. Just…..wow.

    How can someone this stupid be in any type of affluent position? I think we need to start removing the warning labels off of products, we’re preventing Darwin’s theory of natural selection from doing it’s job.

  21. I wonder if Cooper had to call Gloria Allred for a new one to bring out of the dusty closet , that nut case is living in her own fantasy land.

  22. So much stupidity so little time to bring false rape charges against Pres. Trump. That one is so dumb it’s laughable. Sad thing is these nuts are going to make it harder for women who have been raped to be believed.

  23. I thought the craziest thing she said to Anderson was: “You’re fascinating to talk to.” Really?

  24. The woman is being used. I wouldn’t be surprised if a cursory examination
    of her medical history revealed some mental issues.

    1. If she is being ‘used’ – the whole sad spectacle isn’t working out as her ‘user’ had planned – because she can’t seem to get her story straight.

      1. The dems never change their playbook:

        1) label your opponents as racist, homophobic, and/or misogynistic
        2) accuse your opponents as wanting to starve children
        3) accuse your opponents as wanting to kill off the elderly
        4) accuse your opponent of being in bed with “big business”
        5) find lunatics who will testify to 1-4 and put them out on display
        6) steer away from discussion of real issues

        Rinse. Repeat.

  25. I think she actually revealed her own motive for doing this; for going public with this story. This never actually happened. She only WISHES it did or could. She fantasizes about being raped by some powerful man. She even comes onto Anderson Cooper whose own homosexuality he makes no effort to keep secret. I wonder if she thinks she can get him to switch sides.

    1. She’s trying to sell books, and revive a failing career. She should lay off the booze and pills, though. Not a flattering mix.

  26. This lady seems like she has more than a few screws loose……. not to mention it seems like she’s been hitting the sauce or the pills. She is less credible than Ballsey-Ford, who had no credibility whatsoever in spite of all the attention she got from libs.

  27. Did they come back to her after the break or did they move on to another topic as if she was never on the show.

    1. @t_j I was wondering the same thing. If they are bent on completely destroying their image, they probably came back to her after the break. 🙂 🙂

  28. As a survivor, I can tell you…THERE IS NOTHING SEXY ABOUT RAPE. She is one sick woman. She is out for fame at the expense of real VICTIMS of sexual assault, just like that other woman, you know the one who accused Kavanaugh.

    1. You mean the lady with “beach friends”?

      Sorry, joyful, that you ever had to go through something like that. Hope the man was thrown under the prison, for life, or worse.

  29. Crazy nitwits looking for their 15 minutes of fame is all demonrats can scrape from the sludge at the bottom of the barrel in their quest to destroy Trump. Anderson Cooper used to have some credibility, but alas…it is 2019.

  30. I wonder if Cooper had to call Gloria Allred for a new one to bring out of the dusty closet , that nut case is living in her own fantasy land.

  31. So much stupidity so little time to bring false rape charges against Pres. Trump. That one is so dumb it’s laughable. Sad thing is these nuts are going to make it harder for women who have been raped to be believed.

  32. “Who thinks that rape is sexy?”

    Well obviously, she does. Only a person who thinks that rape is ‘sexy’ would go public with their bizarre sexual fantasies about being raped by Trump in a department store, and about illegals raping each other ‘on the border’. The woman is deranged.

  33. I thought the craziest thing she said to Anderson was: “You’re fascinating to talk to.” Really?

  34. The woman is being used. I wouldn’t be surprised if a cursory examination
    of her medical history revealed some mental issues.

    1. If she is being ‘used’ – the whole sad spectacle isn’t working out as her ‘user’ had planned – because she can’t seem to get her story straight.

      1. The dems never change their playbook:

        1) label your opponents as racist, homophobic, and/or misogynistic
        2) accuse your opponents as wanting to starve children
        3) accuse your opponents as wanting to kill off the elderly
        4) accuse your opponent of being in bed with “big business”
        5) find lunatics who will testify to 1-4 and put them out on display
        6) steer away from discussion of real issues

        Rinse. Repeat.

  35. Did they come back to her after the break or did they move on to another topic as if she was never on the show.

    1. @t_j I was wondering the same thing. If they are bent on completely destroying their image, they probably came back to her after the break. 🙂 🙂

  36. As bizarre as her statement is, it seems pretty consistent with what she’s been saying. She isn’t the one calling it rape. Various commentators have said it fits the definition of rape, but I don’t think that is the line she is taking.

          1. I’m willing to bet three Mexican chickens with the measles and a rainbow colored unicorn that it’s her.

            1. @fedup lol ok maybe so. I would not be surprised since she spent more time here than at the other place.

          2. @Tracy Give me a hint who y’all are talking about! L.O.A. isn’t ringing a bell with me.

              1. @Tracy Ah, I’ll have to pay more attention! Y’all may very well be right. I knew there had to be a reason I didn’t like T_ump!

      1. I don’t know enough of the facts to say one way or another, and I doubt you do either. She claims that right after it happened, she privately confided in two journalists. The journalists apparently have backed her up on this, and say that she told them the same story way back then.

        Now if if she did tell credible people about it back then and it was believed by them then, that would be a strong indicator that her story was true, or at the very least that something like it happened with Donald Trump at the time. But I don’t know her, nor do I know the journalists to whom she confided, so I don’t know. Neither do you.

        Given what we know about Donald Trump’s lifestyle back then in NYC, it sure wouldn’t be much of a surprise if it was happened, would it?

        1. Yes I would be surprised, and I’m not going to believe sordid tales after decades all of a sudden coming out. Oh and coinciding with a book.

          Also – fantasizing about rape? She is a nut like Bernie.

          1. So if you don’t believe sordid tales that come out decades later, then you must not believe Juanita Broaddrick either?

            Whatever this woman’s current motivations or mental state, for me it matters whether or not she told the same story to her two confidants at the time it happened. Same goes for Juanita Broaddrick.

            1. Well that settles it, O.J. is innocent. After all, he’s telling the same story today as he did 20 years ago, so it must be true; at least it is when following your brilliant line of thinking.

              1. Well now that’s completely ridiculous. OJ had a strong motivation to make up an alibi 20 years ago and the alibi holds today. Why on earth would this woman have made up this story 20 years ago and privately confided the embarrassing and hurtful details to two friends? You think she was banking on Trump becoming President or even more famous than he already was.

                1. Hurtful? It wasn’t hurtful, it was “sexxxy”. Get it straight. If you believe this nutbag so much, stay with what she has professed. Rape is sexy, right?

                  If she thinks rape is sexy, then it wasn’t rape, it was just good old-fashioned, consensual f’ing.

                  Oh, btw, The Juice’s alibi had more holes than Swiss cheese, they simply assembled a black jury that was as evil in mind as O.J. was.

            2. Juanita is much more believable, she isn’t a loon either.

              But yes, Clinton did have troubles with “bimbo eruptions”, thankfully for him he had Hillary to help suppress them.

              1. So then you don’t care if sordid tales come out decades later, provided that you want to believe them.

                I wouldn’t call Juanita a “loon,” but she did sign an affidavit under penalty of perjury claiming that nothing sordid happened, then years later she changed her story and claimed something happened. So it is not as if she doesn’t have credibility problems herself.

                Not attacking her. It could be that both are telling the truth. Just pointing out the hypocrisy of dismissing one for reasons you overlook with the other.

  37. With such a…er…flexible definition of ‘rape’ and a curious perception of prevailing attitudes about rape, no doubt she’ll be accusing the very gay AC of ‘raping’ her.

    1. Where commie-socialist progressives are involved, words do not mean anything anymore. Lies are truth and truth are lies and we are all screwed.

  38. So…Trump raped her like a gentleman? She said that most people look at rape as being sexy as in a fantasy. I think she’s most likely talking about herself.

      1. @t_ump She said it hurt, but rough sex hurts.

        That aside she’s clearly missing a few marbles. She thinks that most people believe rape is sexy like a fantasy, which more than likely includes her or she wouldn’t have that twisted and clearly wrong view. You’ve already defended her up and down on her other interview, so let’s hear you defend the crazy woman saying that.

        What she views as rape is clearly screwed up.

        1. Plus, it implies that whatever she alleges happened with Trump was a consensual sexual fantasy…but then it could just as easily be some fantasy she whipped up in her addled brain that never actually happened at all. The media should find out more about these freaks they interview on the air…for instance, obtain the list of drugs (legal and otherwise) the person is using, what medical conditions they are being treated for and a bit about other relationships they have had throughout their lives…not that obvious facts have ever stopped the media from using psychos to push their agenda.

          1. @charli They’d be wise to just use the comments in her book and stop putting her on air.

            …it implies that whatever she alleges happened with Trump was a consensual sexual fantasy

            Yep.

        2. First, I didn’t defend her. Second, I agree that her statements on rape are bizarre. I said so in my post. That said, she most certainly did not accuse Trump of behaving gentlemanly. She just doesn’t think of it as rape, and my guess is that this has something to do with the fact that she was obviously flirting with him and went into a dressing room with him where one of them was apparently going to try on a see-through body suit.

          1. @t_ump The gentleman comment was obvious sarcasm. It’s impossible to rape someone like a gentleman.

            1. Really? Then why did you write in your previous comment:

              “She said it hurt, but rough sex hurts.”

              Was that sarcasm too?

              1. @t_ump Because what some people view as pleasure is pain and terror for someone else. There really are women that fantasize about being raped. Before you get a chance to call BS here it is….

                https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/psyched/200805/why-do-women-have-erotic-rape-fantasies

                They’re fantasies….not literally wanting to be raped by a stranger. Some women like to be dominated when it comes to sex, including the involvement of pain.

                From the sounds of her she’s one of those women that views rape as being sexy. The claim that most people view rape as being sexy came from somewhere, and it had to come from within herself. She sure as heck denounced it being a violent act.

                1. @fedup Definitely not the book for me. A lot of people are into S&M (sorry) and I find the whole thing bizarre and scary. It’s not just some women that want to be dominated and tortured, but men as well. As for myself I’d be running out the door with my tail between my legs. 😀

                2. @kong1967 With what she professes, I’d say she would go along and agree with what that book covers as subject material.

                3. @fedup I have to agree. If she invites you into the bedroom….watch out. She’ll dig out the toy and it’s not for her.

      2. She is claiming that Trump attacked her, pushed her against a wall, and penetrated her against her will. To any thinking person, this would be called rape. But really, it’s obvious that the old crone is lying – publicly expressing her dried up little sexual fantasies is a cry for help – and a desperate attempt to make a fast buck.

        1. And how can that happen in a dressing room without anyone else being aware or even hearing it??

        2. Taking her claims at face value, she is also claiming that she was flirting with him and that she went into a dressing room with him where one of the two of them was apparently supposed to try on a see-through body suit. So there was something going on between them, and this wasn’t a stranger-rape type of situation. If this happened today, despite that the description is definitely rape, maybe it would prosecuted as a rape, but it would be an uphill battle and the life of the victim would be turned upside down.

          Back then, the laws may have been similar or the same, but in circumstances such as this where she was a willing participant up to the point he shoved her against the wall, attitudes were different about this sort of stuff, and most women from her generation and in her situation would not have gone to the police and pushed for a rape charge against him. As one of her confidants told her, his lawyers would have ruined her life and she probably wouldn’t win, and unfortunately that was sound advice.

          Of course, you’ve dismissed her claim as a complete fabrication. I don’t know enough to say one way or another. She seems “eccentric,” to put it mildly, but if she really did privately tell the same story to two journalists back then, and if the two are credible, believed her then, and back her up now, then that would strongly suggest that something like this happened.

          1. @t_ump You aren’t the slightest concerned about her agreeing to try on lingerie for him and allowing him in the dressing room, then referring to rape in her case as being a sexual fantasy? The woman is clearly not looking at what happened to her as rape as we know it. She was clearly inviting to him (if it happened) and she clearly was following all the leads to engage in sex.

            Most women would have told Trump to go eff himself and not agree to try on lingerie for him. Most women would not have allowed Trump in the dressing room while she tried it on. As far as I’m concerned she was just as much a part of it as Trump was….IF it happened.

            1. LOL, you obviously aren’t even reading what I am writing or listening to what she is saying.

              Of course she didn’t call it rape and she doesn’t think it should be treated as such. In fact, she keeps putting her foot in her mouth by trying to explain why it wasn’t rape. As for me, I’ve repeatedly said that she doesn’t think it a rape. That said, I think if she told credible confidants the same story back then, it greatly enhances her credibility.

              All that means would mean is that the event probably happened, it doesn’t fully address whether it would qualify as a rape, absent the insurmountable limitations problem.

              1. @t_ump No no no….she’s definitely calling it rape but defeating herself by explaining it as something completely different.

                1. No. She has repeatedly denied it was rape, including in this very clip. The commentators have foisted rape into the discussion because as they see it her description facts fits rape. But that isn’t what she has been saying and I’ll be the book doesn’t say it either. (Although I won’t read it so I wont know.)

  39. Crazy nitwits looking for their 15 minutes of fame is all demonrats can scrape from the sludge at the bottom of the barrel in their quest to destroy Trump. Anderson Cooper used to have some credibility, but alas…it is 2019.

  40. “Well she’s not as credible as Blasey-Ford, but darn convincing in my book.
    – A whole bunch of tiny leftist thought bubbles

      1. @charli I don’t know….I quite like it when they fall flat on their faces. But you’re right…the public would be much better served if they focused more on the truth than the leftist agenda.

        1. LOL!!! Yes, it is popcorn popping time when it comes to the lunacy of any on the left; however, I am sick of this obstruction and pure hatred for the American people….that said, cheer up. It is unlikely that they will change anytime soon. The “press” has been this way toward conservatives forever…at least 100 years.

          1. @charli Yep, and I’m not convinced that it’s been ratcheted up because of Trump as opposed to a reaction to getting their butts kicked when Hillary was a shoe-in. This may not decrease in intensity when Trump leaves office.

  41. Well, that programmed political propaganda scene just imploded to hell .. again.. lol

    Yeah, another perfect leftwing false rape accuser political tool to use against Republicans .. lol

    1. But it’s so EARLY yet! It’s not even 2020….this is going to be a LOOOOONNNGGG year and a half. :whew:

  42. I think she gave Anderson Cooper the creeps. He probably had that chair she sat in tossed out and his desk sanitized after that segment.

  43. She is from the feminist author Erica Jong “Fear of Flying” generation – the zipless f*ck fantasy ladies. Look it up.

    Women actually did what Trump described – he was no predator. He was a victim of the first round of “liberated ladies”. You had to have been there.

    Erica Jong and Jane Fonda wailed the streets would run with blood if Obama was not elected in 2008. And got national publicity for their very utterances – the start of our long national nightmare. Look that one up too.

    Moving past that is what Trump meant when he asked for America to be Great Again. No we, don’t want to go back to the days of first wave feminism.

  44. She’s creepy and bat crap crazy. Those remarks are very telling considering she is accusing someone of rape.

    1. Yep. Another New Age mystic shamaness who was astrally penetrated by Trump in her mushroom driven fever dream.

      Rub some essential oils on it, honey, it’ll make it feel better.

  45. Whoa! What a strange woman, and I’m trying to think what/who she reminds me of. Something there. Maybe it’ll come to me.

      1. You know, yeah, maybe that’s it. Maybe, though, Jim Carrey in The Mask or him as Fire Marshall Bill.

  46. Her and Bernie Sanders would get along great, he said the same thing. And they’re both insane for saying it.

  47. She’s an embarrassment to herself. Why would anyone put her on TV?………Oh, that’s right she’s accusing Trump. 😉

    1. I’ll say it: CNN is a very deep state CIA sponsored disinformation operation.
      No other explanation works.

    1. When Confederate Democrats call Lincoln Republicans racists, consider the source..

      When radical intolerant extremist Democrat liberal fascists calls Constitutional Lincoln Republicans fascists, consider the source..

      When Democrat militant feminists and sexual predator serial rapists accuse Republicans of rape, consider the source ..

      The pattern is always the same with Democrats, just accuse Republicans of what they were and are guilty of, (projectionism) then Wala.. they’re righteous, noble, and good.. and Lincoln Republicans are evil .. lol yeah, right .. lol

    1. Who else are they going to get to bash Trump – just some fat old union bosses. She was the best they could find for this 24 hour news cycle.

  48. As bizarre as her statement is, it seems pretty consistent with what she’s been saying. She isn’t the one calling it rape. Various commentators have said it fits the definition of rape, but I don’t think that is the line she is taking.

      1. I don’t know enough of the facts to say one way or another, and I doubt you do either. She claims that right after it happened, she privately confided in two journalists. The journalists apparently have backed her up on this, and say that she told them the same story way back then.

        Now if if she did tell credible people about it back then and it was believed by them then, that would be a strong indicator that her story was true, or at the very least that something like it happened with Donald Trump at the time. But I don’t know her, nor do I know the journalists to whom she confided, so I don’t know. Neither do you.

        Given what we know about Donald Trump’s lifestyle back then in NYC, it sure wouldn’t be much of a surprise if it was happened, would it?

        1. Yes I would be surprised, and I’m not going to believe sordid tales after decades all of a sudden coming out. Oh and coinciding with a book.

          Also – fantasizing about rape? She is a nut like Bernie.

          1. So if you don’t believe sordid tales that come out decades later, then you must not believe Juanita Broaddrick either?

            Whatever this woman’s current motivations or mental state, for me it matters whether or not she told the same story to her two confidants at the time it happened. Same goes for Juanita Broaddrick.

            1. Well that settles it, O.J. is innocent. After all, he’s telling the same story today as he did 20 years ago, so it must be true; at least it is when following your brilliant line of thinking.

            2. Juanita is much more believable, she isn’t a loon either.

              But yes, Clinton did have troubles with “bimbo eruptions”, thankfully for him he had Hillary to help suppress them.

              1. So then you don’t care if sordid tales come out decades later, provided that you want to believe them.

                I wouldn’t call Juanita a “loon,” but she did sign an affidavit under penalty of perjury claiming that nothing sordid happened, then years later she changed her story and claimed something happened. So it is not as if she doesn’t have credibility problems herself.

                Not attacking her. It could be that both are telling the truth. Just pointing out the hypocrisy of dismissing one for reasons you overlook with the other.

  49. So…Trump raped her like a gentleman? She said that most people look at rape as being sexy as in a fantasy. I think she’s most likely talking about herself.

      1. @t_ump She said it hurt, but rough sex hurts.

        That aside she’s clearly missing a few marbles. She thinks that most people believe rape is sexy like a fantasy, which more than likely includes her or she wouldn’t have that twisted and clearly wrong view. You’ve already defended her up and down on her other interview, so let’s hear you defend the crazy woman saying that.

        What she views as rape is clearly screwed up.

        1. First, I didn’t defend her. Second, I agree that her statements on rape are bizarre. I said so in my post. That said, she most certainly did not accuse Trump of behaving gentlemanly. She just doesn’t think of it as rape, and my guess is that this has something to do with the fact that she was obviously flirting with him and went into a dressing room with him where one of them was apparently going to try on a see-through body suit.

      2. She is claiming that Trump attacked her, pushed her against a wall, and penetrated her against her will. To any thinking person, this would be called rape. But really, it’s obvious that the old crone is lying – publicly expressing her dried up little sexual fantasies is a cry for help – and a desperate attempt to make a fast buck.

        1. Taking her claims at face value, she is also claiming that she was flirting with him and that she went into a dressing room with him where one of the two of them was apparently supposed to try on a see-through body suit. So there was something going on between them, and this wasn’t a stranger-rape type of situation. If this happened today, despite that the description is definitely rape, maybe it would prosecuted as a rape, but it would be an uphill battle and the life of the victim would be turned upside down.

          Back then, the laws may have been similar or the same, but in circumstances such as this where she was a willing participant up to the point he shoved her against the wall, attitudes were different about this sort of stuff, and most women from her generation and in her situation would not have gone to the police and pushed for a rape charge against him. As one of her confidants told her, his lawyers would have ruined her life and she probably wouldn’t win, and unfortunately that was sound advice.

          Of course, you’ve dismissed her claim as a complete fabrication. I don’t know enough to say one way or another. She seems “eccentric,” to put it mildly, but if she really did privately tell the same story to two journalists back then, and if the two are credible, believed her then, and back her up now, then that would strongly suggest that something like this happened.

          1. @t_ump You aren’t the slightest concerned about her agreeing to try on lingerie for him and allowing him in the dressing room, then referring to rape in her case as being a sexual fantasy? The woman is clearly not looking at what happened to her as rape as we know it. She was clearly inviting to him (if it happened) and she clearly was following all the leads to engage in sex.

            Most women would have told Trump to go eff himself and not agree to try on lingerie for him. Most women would not have allowed Trump in the dressing room while she tried it on. As far as I’m concerned she was just as much a part of it as Trump was….IF it happened.

            1. LOL, you obviously aren’t even reading what I am writing or listening to what she is saying.

              Of course she didn’t call it rape and she doesn’t think it should be treated as such. In fact, she keeps putting her foot in her mouth by trying to explain why it wasn’t rape. As for me, I’ve repeatedly said that she doesn’t think it a rape. That said, I think if she told credible confidants the same story back then, it greatly enhances her credibility.

              All that means would mean is that the event probably happened, it doesn’t fully address whether it would qualify as a rape, absent the insurmountable limitations problem.

              1. @t_ump No no no….she’s definitely calling it rape but defeating herself by explaining it as something completely different.

        2. And how can that happen in a dressing room without anyone else being aware or even hearing it??

  50. “Well she’s not as credible as Blasey-Ford, but darn convincing in my book.
    – A whole bunch of tiny leftist thought bubbles

Comments are closed.